Talk:Presbyterianism
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Presbyterianism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should There Be More Emphasis on Rejection of Bishops?
[edit]Knowing nigh on nothing of the history, I am curious if the lede and article more broadly should emphasize that the presbytery was adopted as a rejection of the hierarchy of bishops, as is noted in Footnote 13, quoting James Rankin. This may not be the case and it might be offensive to describe the faith as based on what it rejects but I expected to find much more discussion of bishops here. Czrisher (talk) 16:34, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- Should probably be emphasized in the history section, which needs a lot of work. --Jfhutson (talk) 16:41, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, and also of the idea of the "only king and head of the church" being Jesus. StAnselm (talk) 16:42, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- B-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- B-Class Religion articles
- Top-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- B-Class Christianity articles
- Top-importance Christianity articles
- B-Class Reformed Christianity articles
- Top-importance Reformed Christianity articles
- WikiProject Reformed Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles